bonecement.com

Biomet Cement and Cementing Systems


Vacuum Mixing & Delivery

 References

  1. Lindén U. Mechanical properties of bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique, Clin Orthop. 272: 274–8, 1991.
  2. Jasty M, Davies JP, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Harrigan TP, Harris WH. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements, Clin Orthop. 259: 122–9, 1990.
  3. Lidgren L, Drar H, Moller J. Strength of polymethylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing, Acta Orthop Scand. 55(5): 536–41, 1984.
  4. Lidgren L, Bodelind B, Möller J, Bone cement improved by vacuum mixing and chilling, Acta Orthop Scand 57, 27–32, 1987.
  5. Alkire M, Dabezies E , Hastings P High Vacuum As a Method of Reducing Porosity of Polymethylmethacrylate,  Othopaedics November  Vol 10/No 11, 1987.
  6. Wang J-S,  Franzén H, Jonsson E, Lidgren L, Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum, Acta Orthop Scand 64(2): 143–146, 1993.
  7. Wilkinson J.M, Stockely I et al, Effect of Mixing Ttechnique on the Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 15: 663–667, 2000
  8. Dunne N-J, Orr J, Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement, Biomaterials 22 1819-1826, 2001
  9. EH40/2001, Occupational Exposure Limits 2001, ISBN 071761977X.
  10. Harris W, Ranawat C. Cemented Acetabular Fixation in THA-Extended Longevity with Modern cementing Technique,  Presented at the 59th Annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Washington, 1992.
  11. Wixon RL, Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement? Clin Orthop Dec;(285): 84–90, 1992.
  12. Linden U, Gillquist J. Air inclusion in bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique, Clin Orthop. (247): 148–51, 1989.
  13. McCaskie AW, Barnes MR, Lin E, Harper WM, Gregg PJ.  Cement pressurisation during hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 May;79(3):379-84.
  14. Rice J, Prenderville T, Murray P, McCormack B, Quinlan W. Femoral cementing techniques in total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 1998;22(5):308-11.
  15. Malchau H, Herberts P. Prognosis of Total Hip Replacement; Surgical and Cementing technique in THR: A Revision-Risk Study of 134 056 Primary Operations, Scientific Exhibition presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Februrary 22–26, Atlanta, USA, 1996.
  16. Carter DR, Gates EI, Harris WH. Strain controlled fatigue of acrylic bone cement, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 16: 647–657, 1982. 
  17. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms, J Biomed Mater Res. 24(2): 135–54, 1990.
  18. Wixson R, Lautenschlager E, Novak M J, Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement., J Arthroplasty, Vol 2, pp. 141-149, 1987
  19. Lewis G, Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement: State of Art Review, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Tennesse 38152. Februrary 1997.
  20. Wang J-S, Kjellson F, Bone cement porosity in Vacuum Mixing system, In Bone cements and Cementing technique ed Walenkamp G, Murray D, Springer Verlag 2001.
  21. Müller-Wille P, Lidgren L. Boiling of moomer during high vacuum mixing of bone cement does not increase cement porosity, 6th EORS Congress, Bergen Norway. 1996; p 50.
  22. Wang J-S, Toksvig-Larsen S, Müller-Wille P, Franzén H, Is their any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity? Journal of Biomedical Material Research (Applied Biomaterials), Vol.33, 115–119, 1996.
  23. Verdenschot N, Huiskes R, Mechanical Effects of Stem Cement Interface Characteristics in Total Hip Replacement, Clin Orthop. 329: 326–336, 1996.
  24. Bishop N,E, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface, J Bone Joint Surg Br. 78(3): 349–56, 1996.
  25. Wang J-S, Aspenberg P, Goodman S, Lidgren L. Interface porosity in cemented implants in vitro study, In 8th European Orthopeic society Meeting in Armsterdam, The Netherlands, May 1998 P, 2.
  26. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties, J of BJS 73B(4): 551–8, 1991. 
  27. Burke D, Gates E, Harris W, Centrifugation as a Method of Improving Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Acrylic Bone cement, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Vol 66A,  1984
  28. Breusch S, Cementing Techniques in Total Hip Replacement: Factors Influencing Survival of Femoral Components,  In Bone cements and Cementing technique ed Walenkamp G, Murray D, Springer Verlag 2001
  29. Miller J, Johnson J. Advances in Cementing technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty in The Art of Total Hip Arthroplasty, Grune & Stratton Inc 1987 
  30. Oates KM; Barrera DL; Tucker WN; Chau CC, Bugbee WK, Convery FRIn vivo effect or pressurization of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Biomechanical and histologic analyis.
    J Arthroplasty 10(3), 1995, pp. 373-381
  31. Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellik G, Söderman P, Eisler T,  Prognosis of Total Hip Replacement, Scientific Exhibition presented at the 69th annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, February 13–17, 2002, Dallas, USA